Differentiating mine-reclaimed grasslands from spectrally similar land cover using terrain variables and object-based machine learning classification

33Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Incorporating ancillary, non-spectral data may improve the separability of land use/land cover classes. This study investigates the use of multi-temporal digital terrain data combined with aerial National Agriculture Imagery Program imagery for differentiating mine-reclaimed grasslands from non-mining grasslands across a broad region (6085 km2). The terrain data were derived from historical digital hypsography and a recent light detection and ranging data set. A geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) approach, combined with two machine learning algorithms, Random Forests and Support Vector Machines, was used because these methods facilitate the use of ancillary data in classification. The results suggest that mine-reclaimed grasslands can be mapped accurately, with user’s and producer’s accuracies above 80%, due to a distinctive topographic signature in comparison with other spectrally similar grasslands within this landscape. The use of multi-temporal digital elevation model data and pre-mining terrain data only generally provided statistically significant increased classification accuracy in comparison with post-mining terrain data. Elevation change data were of value, and terrain shape variables generally improved the classification. GEOBIA and machine learning algorithms were useful in exploiting these non-spectral data, as data gridded at variable cell sizes can be summarized at the scale of image objects, allowing complex interactions between predictor variables to be characterized.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maxwell, A. E., & Warner, T. A. (2015). Differentiating mine-reclaimed grasslands from spectrally similar land cover using terrain variables and object-based machine learning classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(17), 4384–4410. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1083632

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free