Stakeholder ratings and corporate financial performance: Socially responsible for what?

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper aims at empirically supporting, in a cross-country and cross-industry analysis, the instrumental role of stakeholder management by adopting a disaggregated approach to the corporate social performance measurement. By using a sample of 250 European industrial listed firms, from 10 European countries, in the period 2001-2003, we find the following evidence: i) the firm is not socially responsible towards all stakeholders, but invests more in key-stakeholders, those who are (perceived as) more influential on its business and have a more valuable impact on its financial performance; ii) a null or weak significance of the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) in the whole sample hides highly significant opposite relationships in two separate sub-samples (i.e. firms with positive and negative relationship, respectively): the sign of the CSP-CFP link cannot be expected to be univocal, since the marginal reward-cost equilibrium of social investment is firm-specific.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Venanzi, D. (2013). Stakeholder ratings and corporate financial performance: Socially responsible for what? Corporate Ownership and Control, 10(4 A), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i4art8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free