Queensland’s budget austerity and its impact on social welfare: Is the cure worse than the disease?

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While considerable attention has been paid to the austerity experiments in Europe, much less attention has been paid to austerity case studies from other parts of the world. This paper examines the case of Queensland, Australia, where the government has pursued austerity measures, while making dire warnings that unless public debt was slashed and the public service sector downsized, Queensland risked becoming the Spain of Australia. The comparison is incomprehensible, given the very different economic situation in Queensland compared with Spain. This comparison constructed a sense of crisis that helped to mask standard neoliberal economic reform. While pursuing neoliberal economic policies, the Queensland Government has also been introducing draconian laws that limit civil liberties and political freedoms for ordinary citizens. This mix of authoritarianism and austerity has met considerable resistance, and this dynamic is discussed in the paper, along with the predictable and unequal impact that austerity measures have had on the general population and social services.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marston, G. (2014). Queensland’s budget austerity and its impact on social welfare: Is the cure worse than the disease? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 41(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.3955

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free