The Case for a Single Model that can Both Generate Continuations and Fill in the Blank

2Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The task of inserting text into a specified position in a passage, known as fill in the blank (FITB), is useful for a variety of applications where writers interact with a natural language generation (NLG) system to craft text. While previous work has tackled this problem with models trained specifically to do the fill-in-theblank task, a more useful model is one that can effectively perform both FITB and continuation. In this work, we evaluate the feasibility of using a single model to do both tasks. We show that models pre-trained with a FITBstyle objective are capable of both tasks, while models pre-trained for continuation are not. Finally, we show how FITB models can be easily finetuned to allow for fine-grained control over the length and word choice of the generation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ippolito, D., Dugan, L., Reif, E., Yuan, A., Coenen, A., & Callison-Burch, C. (2022). The Case for a Single Model that can Both Generate Continuations and Fill in the Blank. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022 - Findings (pp. 2421–2432). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.findings-naacl.185

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free