Preoperative estimate of natural ureteral length based on computed tomography and/or plain radiography

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To predict natural ureter lengths based on clinical images. We reviewed our image database of patients who underwent multiphasic computed tomography urography from January 2019 to April 2020. Natural ureteral length (ULCTU) was measured using a three-dimensional curved multiplanar reformation technique. Patient parameters including age, height, and height of the lumbar spine, the index of ureteral length using kidney/ureter/bladder (KUB) radiographs (C-P and C-PS) and computed tomography (ULCT) were collected. ULCTU correlated most strongly with ULCT. R square and adjusted R square values from multivariate regression were 0.686 and 0.678 (left side) and 0.516 and 0.503 (right side), respectively. ULCTU could be estimated by the regression model in three different scenarios as follows:ULCT + C-PULCTUL = 0.405 × ULCTL+ 0.626 × C-PL – 0.508 cmULCTUR = 0.558 × ULCTR+ 0.218 × C-PR + 6.533 cmULCTULCTUL = 0.876 × ULCTL+ 6.337 cmULCTUR = 0.710 × ULCTR+ 9.625 cmC-PULCTUL = 0.678 × C-PL+ 4.836 cmULCTUR = 0.495 × C-PR+ 10.353 cmWe provide equations to predict ULCTU based on CT, KUB or CT plus KUB for different clinical scenarios. The formula based on CT plus KUB provided the most accurate estimation, while the others had lower validation values but could still meet clinical needs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hsu, J. T., Tseng, J. S., Chen, M., Sun, F. J., Chen, C. W., Lin, W. R., … Chiu, A. W. (2021). Preoperative estimate of natural ureteral length based on computed tomography and/or plain radiography. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91658-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free