Electrode migration in cochlear implant patients: Not an exception

32Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: It was the aim of this study to investigate the occurrence of electrode migration of a cochlear implant in patients with and without complaints. Methods: We performed a retrospective case review in a tertiary referral center. The electrode position was evaluated in 35 cochlear implantees, 16 with a CII HiFocus1 (non-positioner) and 19 with a HiRes90K HiFocus1J, using multiplanar reconstructions of the postoperative CT scans. Of 5 patients, a second scan was obtained to evaluate complaints of performance drop, vertigo, tinnitus, headache or nonauditory stimulation. Displacements of the electrode contacts were calculated and displacements of >1 mm were considered a migration. The possible correlation with implant type, insertion depth or presence of complaints was analyzed. Results: Migrations were detected in 10 patients (29%). There was a significant effect of the implant type in favour of the HiFocus1, but no relation with the original insertion depth of the device. In the 5 patients scanned because of complaints, two migrations were detected. Conclusions: In our patient population, electrode migration was not uncommon and turned out to occur in patients with and without complaints. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Der Marel, K. S., Verbist, B. M., Briaire, J. J., Joemai, R. M. S., & Frijns, J. H. M. (2012). Electrode migration in cochlear implant patients: Not an exception. Audiology and Neurotology, 17(5), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1159/000338475

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free