Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnostic accuracy of staging in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Background:Accurate clinical staging of patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has a significant impact on treatment decisions. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging of CCA.Methods:We performed comprehensive systematic search in Web of Science (including MEDLINE) and Excerpta Medica Database for relevant diagnostic studies in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis statement. Based on data extracted from patient-based analysis, we calculated the pooled sensitivity and specificity with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In addition, the publication bias was assessed by Deek funnel plot of the asymmetry test. The potential heterogeneity was explored by threshold effect analysis and subgroup analyses.Results:Thirty-two studies with 1626 patients were included in present analysis. In T stage, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.93), 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.91) respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT were 0.91 (95% CI 0.83-0.95) and 0.85 (0.64-0.95) respectively. In N stage, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.64 (95% CI 0.52-0.74) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.51-0.87) respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were 0.52 (95% CI 0.37-0.66) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.79-0.97) respectively. In M stage, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT were 0.56 (95% CI, 0.42-0.69) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97) respectively. The Deek test revealed no significant publication bias. No threshold effect was identified. The subgroup analyses showed that pathological type (extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs hilar cholangiocarcinoma/intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma), country (Asia vs non-Asia) and type of MRI (1.5T vs. 3.0T) were potential causes for the heterogeneity of MRI studies and country (Asia vs non-Asia) was a potential source for 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.Conclusion:The analysis suggested that both modalities provide reasonable diagnostic accuracy in T stage without significant differences between them. We recommend that both modalities be considered based on local availability and practice for the diagnosis of primary CCA tumors. In N stage, the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis (N) of CCA is still limited by MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT, due to unsatisfactory diagnostic accuracy of both. Nevertheless, 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used to confirm lymph node metastasis while a negative result may not rule out metastasis. Furthermore, 18F-FDG PET/CT have a low sensitivity and a high specificity for detection of distant metastasis.