Comparative analysis on urban flood countermeasures based on life cycle thinking: A comparison between enhancing of drainage capacity project and sponge city

6Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The recent increase in rainstorm waterlogging disasters has acutely threatened sustainable urban development in China. Traditional strategy to solve this problem is drainage capacity enhancing projects, which aims at enlarging the discharge of water. Recently, there is a new countermeasure emerged in Chinese cities: ‘Sponge City’, which aims at enlarging the absorption of water by increasing the curves of urban land. This article endeavours to make a comparison between these two countermeasures by building a framework to design and analyze the private or social costs of two projects which have the same rainwater control capacity. Finally, we have come to the conclusion that only considering initial cost, Sponge City unit cost is much more than drainage capacity enhancing project unit cost; considering external cost, Sponge City is not only competitive from an economical perspective, from an environmental perspective Sponge City is also competitive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fan, X., & Matsumoto, T. (2020). Comparative analysis on urban flood countermeasures based on life cycle thinking: A comparison between enhancing of drainage capacity project and sponge city. Environments - MDPI, 7(7), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments7070051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free