Journal Article

Ultrasonic versus hand filing of dentin: A quantitative study

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology (1980) 49(1) 79-81
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(80)90034-1
78Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Ultrasonic energized filing was compared to hand instrumentation for its ability to remove dentin. The ultrasonically activated file was significantly superior in its capacity to remove dentin, as determined by both gravimetric and photographic overlay techniques. © 1980.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, H., Cunningham, W. T., Norris, J. P., & Cotton, W. R. (1980). Ultrasonic versus hand filing of dentin: A quantitative study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 49(1), 79–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(80)90034-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free