Comment on "Short-cut transport path for Asian dust directly to the Arctic: A case Study" by Huang et al. (2015) in Environ. Res. Lett.

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The suggestion of Huang et al. (2015) on the climatological-scale transport of Asian dust to the Arctic appears to be an important and worthwhile assertion. It is unfortunate that the authors undermined, to a certain degree, the quality of that assertion by a misinterpretation of the critical 24 March 2010 Arctic event (which was chosen by the authors to illustrate their generalized, climatological-scale Arctic transport claim). They attempted to characterize that key event using AERONET/AEROCAN retrievals taken a day later and misinterpreted those largely cloud-dominated retrievals as being representative of Asian dust while apparently not recognizing that the coarse-mode aerosol optical depth retrievals on the previous day were actually coherent with their Arctic transport hypothesis. Copyright:

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ranjbar, K., O’neill, N. T., & Aboel-Fetouh, Y. (2022, February 4). Comment on “Short-cut transport path for Asian dust directly to the Arctic: A case Study” by Huang et al. (2015) in Environ. Res. Lett. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Copernicus GmbH. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1757-2022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free