Response to Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin in Dairy Cows with Different Genetic Merit for Milk Production

17Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Thirty-nine multiparous cows obtained from two genetic lines were utilized to determine the effect of genetic merit on lactation response to long-term administration of recombinant bST. Cow index ranged from –70 to 456 (X = 183) and –494 to –88 (X = –288) kg milk for high and low genetic groups, respectively. Cows were blocked by calving date and randomly assigned to treatment within genetic group. Treatments were 0, 10.3, 20.6, and 30.9 mg somatotropin injected daily from wk 14 through 44 postpartum. Cows were fed one of two total mixed rations. Diet 1 (NE1 = 1.65 Mcal/kg, CP = 18%, and ADF = 22%) was fed from start of lactation lo at least 4 wk after initiation of treatment. Cows were switched to diet 2 (NE1 = 1.56 Mcal/kg, CP = 16%, and ADF = 27%) when milk output fell below 25 kg/d. Forty-four week lactation yields were 9800 and 9447 kg milk; 364 and 354 kg fat; and 322 and 309 kg protein for high and low genetic groups, respectively. Milk, milk fat, or protein yield due to somatotropin did not differ between genetic groups. Increasing dosage of bST increased milk, 4% FCM, fat, and protein yields in a linear fashion. Percentages of fat and protein of milk were similar for all treatment groups. Body weight changes were not significantly different among treatments, but condition score changes decreased linearly with increasing dose of bST. Longterm treatment with recombinant bST had no apparent effect on incidence of health problems or reproduction. © 1990, American Dairy Science Association. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nytes, A. J., Combs, D. K., Shook, G. E., Shaver, R. D., & Cleale, R. M. (1990). Response to Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin in Dairy Cows with Different Genetic Merit for Milk Production. Journal of Dairy Science, 73(3), 784–791. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78731-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free