Ministry of Health user fees, equity and decentralization: Lessons from Honduras

Abstract

Decentralization is commonly championed as a means for achieving equity. To date, however, there has been little discussion of the mechanisms underlying this relationship, and several of the few empirical investigations that have addressed the topic have found the converse; that decentralization has exacerbated inequalities. This article examines the performance and equity in financing of the Honduras Ministry of Health's (MOH) decentralized user fee system. The MOH of Honduras established a national user fee policy in 1989. It provided a framework of rules and regulations and decentralized administration of the system to the regional offices. A survey conducted under the auspices of this study provided detailed information about the structures and operations of MOH user fee systems. The survey revealed that the systems vary markedly by region, creating horizontal inequities, and that they have numerous other shortcomings. The average price of a consultation is low, US$0.16, and revenues have consistently equalled just 2% of MOH expenditures. The systems' administrative costs are equal to 67% of their revenues. Eliminating the user fee systems in all but the national and regional hospitals would actually save money and/or enable the MOH to provide more care. Average consultation prices are highest in health posts, intermediate in centres and lowest in the national hospitals, thereby encouraging the inappropriate use of the MOH's pyramidal referral system and fostering MOH inefficiency. Fee levels and exemption practices are horizontally and vertically inequitable. The likelihood of paying for an ambulatory visit is highest at a health post, 89%, and lowest at a hospital, 49%. Individuals from the poorest one-fifth of households are the most likely to have to pay for care. Honduras' experience demonstrates that a decentralized user fee system is not necessarily equitable, and that, more generally, the gains that can be realized from decentralizing user fee systems are not automatic. They must be anticipated, planned for and cultivated by a well-designed and well-implemented initiative that is not a single, one-time event, but rather a dynamic, on-going enterprise.