From ‘if-then’ to ‘what if?’ Rethinking healthcare algorithmics with posthuman speculative ethics

12Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article discusses the role that algorithmic thinking and management play in health care and the kind of exclusions this might create. We argue that evidence-based medicine relies on research and data to create pathways for patient journeys. Coupled with data-based algorithmic prediction tools in health care, they establish what could be called health care algorithmics—a mode of management of healthcare that produces forms of algorithmic governmentality. Relying on a critical posthumanist perspective, we show how healthcare algorithmics is contingent on the way authority over bodies is produced and how predictive health care algorithms can reproduce inequalities of the worlds from which they are made, centreing possible futures on existing normativities regulated through algorithmic biopower. In contrast to that, we explore posthuman speculative ethics as a way to challenge understanding of ‘ethics’ and ‘care’ in healthcare algorithmics. We suggest some possible avenues towards working speculative ethics into health care while still being critically attentive to algorithmic modes of management and prediction in health care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, J., Klumbyte, G., & Britton, R. L. (2023). From ‘if-then’ to ‘what if?’ Rethinking healthcare algorithmics with posthuman speculative ethics. Nursing Philosophy, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12447

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free