Quantification of MRI measured myocardial perfusion reserve in healthy humans: A comparison with positron emission tomography

78Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a noninvasive quantitative MRI technique, the K i perfusion method, for myocardial perfusion in humans using 13N-ammonia PEXT as a reference method. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy males (64 ± 8 years) were examined with combined PET and MRI perfusion imaging at rest and during stress induced by dipyridamole in order to determine the myocardial perfusion reserve. Myocardial and blood time concentration curves obtained by Gd-DTPA-enhaneed MRI and 13N-ammonia PET were fitted by a two-compartment perfusion model. Results: Mean perfusion values (±SD) derived from the MRI method at rest and at hyperemia were 80 ± 20 and 183 ± 56 mL/min/100 g, respectively. The same data for PET were 71 ± 16 and 203 ± 67 mL/min/100 g. A linear relationship was observed between MRI and PET-derived myocardial perfusion reserve for regional and global data. Linear regression for the global absolute perfusion reserve gave a correlation coefficient of 0.96 (P < 0.004, y=0.83x-6.9). A good agreement between the two methods to determine low or high perfusion reserves was found. Conclusion: Our data provide validation of the perfusion marker Ki derived by the MRI method as a quantitative marker for myocardial perfusion in healthy humans. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fritz-Hansen, T., Hove, J. D., Kofoed, K. F., Kelbaek, H., & Larsson, H. B. W. (2008). Quantification of MRI measured myocardial perfusion reserve in healthy humans: A comparison with positron emission tomography. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27(4), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21306

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 34

63%

Researcher 13

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

55%

Engineering 12

26%

Physics and Astronomy 7

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free