Long-Term Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Practice: A Norwegian National Survey After More Than 20 Years’ Experience

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: As knowledge of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) expands, understanding factors influencing home use is essential to promote effective therapy. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of MI-E long-term users in Norway and describe clinicians’ self-reported experience and independence with MI-E, cough assessment practices, and MI-E initiation and follow-up in a country with over 20 years of experience. Methods: This cross-sectional study used 4 data sources (1) Norwegian Units for Medical Home-Care Equipment provided data on MI-E users, (2) Statistics Norway provided the overall count of the Norwegian population, (3) The Norwegian Patient Registry supplied population data on specialist health care service use, and (4) a survey of multidisciplinary clinicians collected self-reported data on clinicians MI-E confidence and practices. Results: In 2023, 1,131 individuals in Norway (16% under 18 years) used MI-E devices for long-term treatment, with a prevalence of 53.5 per 100,000 among specialist health care service users and 20.6 per 100,000 in the total population. Of 182 survey respondents, 163 reported MI-E experience, primarily physiotherapists (78%), followed by nurses (13%) and physicians (9%). Physiotherapists had the longest experience and highest confidence in independently initiating MI-E and assisting colleagues. Most clinicians (77%) used multiple methods to assess cough effectiveness, including qualitative assessment, cough peak flow, and swallowing evaluation. Follow-up practices varied widely 43% used patient journals, 5% digital registries, 10% paper records, 27% unspecified overview of MI-E users for follow-up purposes, and 15% had no systematic overview. Regular follow-ups were reported by 43%, whereas 19% followed up only on patient request, 30% were unaware of local routines, and 8% reported no follow-up routines. Conclusions: The MI-E prevalence highlights its role as a substantial therapy for individuals with rare disorders. Variability in follow-up practices underscores the need for standardized guidelines to improve consistency and quality in long-term MI-E care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andersen, T. M., Nørstebø, E., & Hov, B. (2025). Long-Term Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Practice: A Norwegian National Survey After More Than 20 Years’ Experience. Respiratory Care, 70(9), 1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12874

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free