Abstract
In the Results section of the Abstract, there is an error in the second sentence. The correct sentence is: The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR- values of MRI for RE were 88% (95% CI, 85–91%), 90% (95% CI, 88–92%), 17.26 (95% CI, 3.57–83.50), and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.10–0.23); values of TVS were 90% [95% CI, 87–92%], 96% (95% CI, 94–97%), 20.66 (95% CI, 8.71–49.00) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08–0.20), respectively.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Moura, A. P. C., Ribeiro, H. S. A. A., Bernardo, W. M., Simões, R., Torres, U. S., D’Ippolito, G., … Ribeiro, P. A. A. G. (2019, August 1). Correction: Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis (PLoS ONE (2019) 14: 4 (e0214842) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214842). PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221499
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
