Technologies can be not only contentious-overthrowing existing ways of doing things-but also morally contentious-forcing deep reflection on personal values and societal norms. This article investigates that what may impede the acceptance of a technology and/or the development of the field that supports or exploits it, the lines between which often become blurred in the face of morally contentious content. Using a unique dataset with historically important timing-the United States Biotechnology Study fielded just 9 months after the public announcement of the successful cloning of the first mammal (i.e., Dolly the sheep)-we find that microlevel factors (i.e., conservative Christianity) predict unfavorable judgments of the technology-field intersection while macrolevel representations [i.e., exposure to Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics disciplines and media coverage] predict more favorable judgments. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
CITATION STYLE
Cole, B. M., & Banerjee, P. M. (2013). Morally Contentious Technology-Field Intersections: The Case of Biotechnology in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(3), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1416-1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.