Prenatal Testing for Adult-Onset Conditions: the Position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

24Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Advances in genetic testing and the availability of such testing in pregnancy allows prospective parents to test their future child for adult-onset conditions. This ability raises several complex ethical issues. Prospective parents have reproductive rights to obtain information about their fetus. This information may or may not alter pregnancy management. These rights can be in conflict with the rights of the future individual, who will be denied the right to elect or decline testing. This paper highlights the complexity of these issues, details discussions that went into the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Public Policy Task Force’s development of the Prenatal testing for Adult-Onset Conditions position statement adopted in November 2014, and cites relevant literature on this topic through December 2015. Issues addressed include parental rights and autonomy, rights of the future child, the right not to know, possible adverse effects on childhood and the need for genetic counseling. This paper will serve as a reference to genetic counselors and healthcare professionals when faced with this situation in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hercher, L., Uhlmann, W. R., Hoffman, E. P., Gustafson, S., Chen, K. M., & the Public Policy Committee of NSGC. (2016). Prenatal Testing for Adult-Onset Conditions: the Position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(6), 1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9992-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free