Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Radio-chemotherapy with CDDP is the standard for H&N squamous cell cancer. CDDP 100 mg/m2/q3 is the standard; alternative schedules are used to reduce toxicity, mostly 40 mg/m2/q1. Methods: Patients were treated from 1/2010 to 1/2017 in two Radiation Oncology Centres. Propensity score analysis (PS) was retrospectively used to compare these two schedules. Results: Patients analyzed were 166. Most (114/166) had 1w-CDDP while 52 had 3w-CDDP. In the 3w-CDDP group, patients were younger, with better performance status, smaller disease extent and a more common nodal involvement than in the 1w-CDDP. Acute toxicity was similar in the groups. Treatment compliance was lower in the w-CCDP. Overall survival before PS was better for female, for oropharyngeal disease and for 3w-CDDP group. After PS, survival was not related to the CDDP schedule. Conclusions: 3w-CDDP remains the standard for fit patients, weekly schedule could be safely used in selected patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buglione, M., Alterio, D., Maddalo, M., Greco, D., Gerardi, M. A., Tomasini, D., … Jereczek-Fossa, B. A. (2021). Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients. Radiation Oncology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01966-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free