MRI-Conditional Breast Tissue Expander: First In-Human Multi-Case Assessment of MRI-Related Complications and Image Quality

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to assess potential complications and effects on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image quality of a new MRI-conditional breast tissue expander (Motiva Flora®) in its first in-human multi-case application. Twenty-four patients with 36 expanders underwent non-contrast breast MRI with T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences on a 3 T unit before breast tissue expander exchange surgery, being monitored during and after MRI for potential complications. Three board-certified breast radiologists blindly and independently reviewed image quality using a four-level scale (“poor”, “sufficient”, “good”, and “excellent”), with inter-reader reliability being assessed with Kendall’s τb. The maximum diameters of RFID-related artifacts on T1-weighted and DWI sequences were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. All 24 examinations were completed without patient-related or device-related complications. The T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences of all the examinations had “excellent” image quality and a median 11 mm (IQR 9–12 mm) RFID artifact maximum diameter, significantly lower (p < 0.001) than on the DWI images (median 32.5 mm, IQR 28.5–34.5 mm). DWI quality was rated at least “good” in 63% of the examinations, with strong inter-reader reliability (Kendall’s τb 0.837, 95% CI 0.687–0.952). This first in-human study confirms the MRI-conditional profile of this new expander, which does not affect the image quality of T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences and moderately affects DWI quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schiaffino, S., Cozzi, A., Pompei, B., Scarano, A. L., Catanese, C., Catic, A., … Harder, Y. (2023). MRI-Conditional Breast Tissue Expander: First In-Human Multi-Case Assessment of MRI-Related Complications and Image Quality. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134410

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free