A multi-attribute approach to ranking departments based on performance: a balanced scorecard pilot study

4Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Departments are assessed using performance evaluation systems (PES) based on their important performance criteria. The sum of the weighted KPIs’ actualization scores creates the departments' performance ratings, which are used to rank departments from highest to lowest performing. However, this strategy does not account for departmental variances. We used multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) techniques in this study to ascertain the performance of several divisions inside a business. Our study's structure is divided into two distinct parts. In the first stage, pair-wise evaluation matrices are built and attribute weights are established using the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) to determine attribute precedence. The second step employs the Elimination and Choice Expressing the Reality (ELECTRE) methodology to rank the departments using the attribute weights generated in the first stage using the AHP method. At the conclusion of the paper, a case study is presented to demonstrate how departments are organized in accordance with performance management principles within a corporation that use the balance-scorecard program for performance evaluation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Şenel, U. T., Rouyendegh, B. D., & Demir, S. (2022). A multi-attribute approach to ranking departments based on performance: a balanced scorecard pilot study. Complex and Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-022-00710-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free