Randomized, double-blind, pharmacokinetic equivalence trial comparing DRL-rituximab with MabthERa in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

17Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE We sought to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of DRL-rituximab (DRL_RI; potential biosimilar) and innovator rituximab MabThera (Roche, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany; reference medicinal product [RMP]) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Efficacy, pharmacodynamics (PDs), safety, and immunogenicity were also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a double-blind, parallel-group study in patients with untreated DLBCL who were eligible to receive cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy. Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive DRL_RI or RMP for six 21-day cycles of rituximab plus CHOP, with 18 months of follow-up after day 1, cycle 6 (C6). Primary end point was C1 PKs, measured as area under the plasma concentration–time curve from day 0 to 21 (AUC0-21 days) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Equivalence was defined as 90% CIs for the DRL_RI/RMP geometric mean ratios (GMRs) within 80% and 125%. Secondary end points included efficacy noninferiority measured by objective response rate (ORR) at C6 and event-free survival and overall survival at 87 weeks, PK equivalence at C6 and PD equivalence (rate of B-cell depletion and repletion), safety, and immunogenicity. The trial was stopped after sufficient patients for primary end point evaluation were enrolled. Secondary end points are reported as observed. RESULTS A total of 151 patients were randomly assigned (DRL_RI, n = 76; RMP, n = 75). DRL_RI/RMP GMRs for AUC0-21 days and Cmax in C1 were 99.77 (90% CI, 87.60 to 113.63) and 96.19 (90% CI, 88.65 to 104.38), respectively. ORR at C6 for DRL_RI and RMP were 82.0% and 84.8%, respectively. Rates of B-cell depletion/ repletion, immunogenicity, and adverse events were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION DRL_RI and RMP had equivalent PKs, with comparable efficacy, PDs, safety, and immunogenicity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Viswabandya, A., Shah, S., Mukhopadhyay, A., Nagarkar, R. V., Batra, S. S., Lopez-Lazaro, L., … Srivastava, A. (2019). Randomized, double-blind, pharmacokinetic equivalence trial comparing DRL-rituximab with MabthERa in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Journal of Global Oncology, 2019(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.19.00248

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free