Innovative negligence rules

11Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Often, injurers or victims (or both) can adopt a new technology that reduces the social costs of accidents. When adoption costs are not verifiable in court, optimal adoption decisions cannot be induced by means of an appropriate determination of negligence. Hence the parties might either over- or under-adopt.We study how due-care standards should be conditioned on the technology adopted by the parties in order to improve adoption decisions.We demonstrate that standards should be biased upwards or downwards, depending on whether the new technology reduces or increases expected harm.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dari-Mattiacci, G., & Franzoni, L. A. (2014). Innovative negligence rules. American Law and Economics Review, 16(2), 333–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/aht021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free