© 2016 The Author(s). The capacity and power performance of lithium-ion battery cells evolve over time. Themechanisms leading to these changes can often be identified through knowledge of electrode potentials, which contain information about electrochemical processes at the electrodeelectrolyte interfaces. In this study we monitor electrode potentials within full cells containing a Li 1.03 (Ni 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 ) 0.97 O 2 -based (NCM523) positive electrode, a silicon-graphite negative electrode, and an LiPF 6 -bearing electrolyte, with andwithout fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) or vinylene carbonate (VC) additives. The electrode potentials are monitored with a Li-metal reference electrode (RE) positioned besides the electrode stack; changes in these potentials are used to examine electrode state-of-charge (SOC) shifts, material utilization, and loss of electrochemically active material. Electrode impedances are obtained with a Li x Sn RE located within the stack; the data display the effect of cell voltage and electrode SOC changes on the measured values after formation cycling and after aging. Our measurements confirm the beneficial effect of FEC and VC electrolyte additives in reducing full cell capacity loss and impedance rise after cycling in a 3.0-4.2 V range. Comparisons with data from a full cell containing a graphite-based negative highlight the consequences of including silicon in the electrode. Our observations on electrode potentials, capacity, and impedance changes on cycling are crucial to designing long-lasting, silicon-bearing, lithium-ion cells.
CITATION STYLE
Klett, M., Gilbert, J. A., Trask, S. E., Polzin, B. J., Jansen, A. N., Dees, D. W., & Abraham, D. P. (2016). Electrode Behavior RE-Visited: Monitoring Potential Windows, Capacity Loss, and Impedance Changes in Li 1.03 (Ni 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 ) 0.97 O 2 /Silicon-Graphite Full Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 163(6), A875–A887. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0271606jes
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.