Original article: On the receiving end IV: Validation of quality of life indicators

60Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Summary: Four measures of patient functioning and a mood adjective list currently used in trials of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG), and an 8-item Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA) instrument measuring specific side effects of cancer and cancer treatment (GLQ-8), were cross-validated against three established measures of quality of life, mood and psychological adjustment to cancer, in a heterogeneous sample of cancer patients. Correlations between new and established measures were high, indicating good convergent and concurrent validity. Compliance on the longer mood measures was relatively poor. Despite the difficulty in developing direct and methodologically sound measures of quality of life, the regular inclusion of practical indicators of aspects of quality of life in clinical trials would allow improved assessment of the cost-benfit ratio of treatment to outcome in cancer patients. © 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butow, P., Coates, A., Dunn, S., Bernhard, J., & Hürny, C. (1991). Original article: On the receiving end IV: Validation of quality of life indicators. Annals of Oncology, 2(8), 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free