What’s Race Got to Do With It? Disrupting Whiteness in Cultural Capital Research

30Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this essay, we argue that Whiteness is intrinsic to Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital, yet it remains unmarked within U.S.-based sociology of education research. As a result, these studies treat race as a tangential issue as opposed to a structure that is foundational to how society is organized and functions. We disrupt this unmarked relationship between Whiteness and cultural capital by (1) reviewing Bourdieu’s work on race, class, and cultural capital, and the application of these concepts in U.S.-based research; (2) examining the educational field as White institutional space and the concerning consequences of conflating cultural capital with Whiteness; (3) discussing the implications for a research framework embedded in a class-based master narrative; and (4) offering suggestions about how to disrupt Whiteness in cultural capital research, including emphasizing the racialized dimension of the habitus, taking an institutional approach and by taking a race-conscious approach to knowledge production in sociology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richards, B. N., Ceron-Anaya, H., Dumais, S. A., Mueller, J. C., Sánchez-Connally, P., & Wallace, D. (2023). What’s Race Got to Do With It? Disrupting Whiteness in Cultural Capital Research. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 9(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492231160535

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free