Photosynthesis rate, radiation and water use efficiencies of irrigated potato in a semi-arid climate using Eddy covariance techniques

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Understanding the photosynthetic behaviour, radiation use efficiency (RUE) and water use efficiency (WUE) of potatoes in response to diurnal and seasonal fluctuations in weather, is important for optimizing growth and production. The net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide (CO2), is a parameter used to measure the balance between gross CO2 assimilation (also referred to as gross primary production (GPP)) and ecosystem respiration (Reco). The objectives of this study were (i) to quantify the NEE of potato grown in two contrasting agro-ecologies and partition NEE into Reco and GPP; (ii) to describe seasonal patterns in daily photosynthesis, RUE and WUE in potato; and (iii) to analyse the variability in photosynthesis rate, RUE and WUE as affected by weather and crop growth stage. We measured CO2 and water vapour fluxes using eddy covariance techniques in potato fields in two production regions of South Africa. The winter crop had higher mean RUE and WUE values, whereas the summer crop absorbed more CO2. RUE had a negative relationship with incident radiation. To optimize dry matter production, WUE and RUE, potato crops must be well established and develop a full canopy early during the season. Maintaining the crop for a longer period in the field has yield benefits, although they appear to decline over time due to reduced efficiencies as the crop matures. The RUE observed over the growing period in the present study was high, relative to findings by other field studies, despite relatively warm growing conditions that were likely sub-optimal for potato.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

MacHakaire, A. T. B., Steyn, J. M., & Franke, A. C. (2023). Photosynthesis rate, radiation and water use efficiencies of irrigated potato in a semi-arid climate using Eddy covariance techniques. Journal of Agricultural Science, 161(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859623000175

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free