Referring physicians' discordance with the primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator guidelines: A national survey

23Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Heart Rhythm Society guidelines provide patient selection criteria for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). For unknown reasons, guideline-discordant practice is common. Objective: To determine referring physicians' concordance with the primary prevention ICD guidelines. Methods: We mailed a survey regarding ICD guidelines and individual practice characteristics to a random national sample of 3000 physicians selected from the American Medical Association Masterfile - one-third each specializing in family medicine, internal medicine, and general cardiology. Results: Sixty-four percent with correct contact information responded. Three hundred ninety-five (28%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 25%-30%) respondents never refer patients with the intent of consideration for a primary prevention ICD, including 7% (95% CI 5%-10%) of cardiologists. Two hundred twelve (15%; 95% CI 13%-17%) believe ventricular arrhythmias are required before a primary prevention ICD is indicated; 525 (36%; 95% CI 34%-39%) believe that an ejection fraction of >40% warrants a primary prevention ICD; and 361 (25%; 95% CI 23%-27%) would refer a patient for a primary prevention ICD within 40 days of a myocardial infarction. In multivariate analyses, family practice physicians and physicians residing in the western United States most often provided guideline-discordant answers, while cardiologists and those who refer to an electrophysiologist most often provided guideline-concordant answers. Primary care physicians who manage heart failure patients without referral to a subspecialist were not more likely to provide guideline-concordant answers. Conclusions: Answers discordant with the primary prevention ICD guidelines were common, suggesting that referring physician beliefs are an important barrier to appropriate patient referrals for primary prevention ICD implantation. © 2012 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castellanos, J. M., Smith, L. M., Varosy, P. D., Dehlendorf, C., & Marcus, G. M. (2012). Referring physicians’ discordance with the primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator guidelines: A national survey. Heart Rhythm, 9(6), 874–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.01.029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free