The cryoballoon vs irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) study results in context

16Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double Short vs Standard Exposure Duration (CIRCA-DOSE) study was a multicentre, randomised, single-blinded trial that compared contact-force radiofrequency ablation and two different regimens of cryoballoon ablation. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor for the purpose of continuous rhythm monitoring, with all arrhythmia events undergoing independent adjudication by a committee blinded to treatment allocation. The study demonstrated there were no significant differences between contact-force radiofrequency ablation and cryoballoon ablation with respect to recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia, symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia, asymptomatic AF, symptomatic AF or AF burden. While the results of the CIRCA-DOSE study are reviewed here, this article focuses on considerations around the design of the study and places the observed outcomes in context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andrade, J. G., Deyell, M. W., Verma, A., MacLe, L., & Khairy, P. (2020). The cryoballoon vs irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) study results in context. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Review, 9(1), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.15420/AER.2019.13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free