Evaluation of filtration leucocytapheresis for use in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

42Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of filtration leucocytapheresis (LCP) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. LCP was carried out three times, with 1 week separating each session, in 25 drug-resistant RA patients. Results. During each session, 96, 98, 61, 84 and 8% of the granulocytes, monocytes, lymphocytes, platelets and erythrocytes, respectively, that entered the LCP filter were removed. The number of granulocytes, monocytes and lymphocytes in the peripheral blood significantly decreased during each session of LCP. However, there was no significant decrease in the number of circulating blood cells during the study period. On average, 110 x 108 granulocytes, 5.23 x 108 monocytes, and 20.5 x 108 lymphocytes were removed during LCP therapy. Assessment of RA before and after LCP showed a substantial and rapid improvement in the tender joints counts, swollen joint counts, and patient's and physician's assessments. No adverse reactions or complications were noted. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels decreased following LCP, although the change in the latter parameter was statistically insignificant. The concentrations of serum albumin, γ-globulin, IgG, IgM, CH50 and rheumatoid factor titres did not change during or after LCP. Careful analysis indicated that 16 of 25 patients with RA showed ≥ 20% improvement following LCP therapy. Conclusions. Our results suggest that filtration LCP to remove leucocytes from the peripheral blood exerts an immunomodulatory effect in patients with RA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ueki, Y., Yamasaki, S., Kanamoto, Y., Kawazu, T., Yano, M., Matsumoto, K., … Eguchi, K. (2000). Evaluation of filtration leucocytapheresis for use in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology, 39(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/39.2.165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free