Abstract
This paper argues for a theory of natural rights on which they are explained in terms of reasons supplied by rational consent. When (Formula presented.) has a claim-right against (Formula presented.) that (Formula presented.) φ, (Formula presented.) ’s non-consent is not a reason for (Formula presented.) not to simply make (Formula presented.) φ. This theory solves a puzzle that defeats alternative views, including standard will and interest theories, the demand theory of rights, and the view that rights are irreducible or primitive.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Setiya, K. (2025). What is a Right? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 103(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2024.2379266
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.