An Agenda for Public Health Diplomacy in an Age of Populism

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Public health is under pressure from rising populism, disinformation, and weakened global institutions, threatening cooperation, equity, and trust in science. Analysis: Populism politicises health, suppresses evidence, and marginalises vulnerable groups. Public health diplomacy must adapt, becoming more politically aware, ethically grounded, and resilient. Policy Options: We propose nine ways forward: create diplomacy labs for crisis simulation; empower non-state actors like cities and NGOs; strengthen ethical communication and listening; protect health workers; build alternative accountability systems; reframe health as a diplomatic priority; decentralise and diversify funding; develop a new diplomacy curriculum; reinvent and defend multilateralism. Conclusion: Public health diplomacy must evolve into a bold, inclusive, and strategic force. By defending evidence, empowering diverse actors, and reforming institutions, it can safeguard health as a foundation for peace and global progress.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McKee, M., Figueras, J., Kalediene, R., Joshi, A., El-Mohandes, A., Otok, R., … Barros, H. (2025). An Agenda for Public Health Diplomacy in an Age of Populism. Public Health Reviews, 46. https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2025.1609089

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free