Precision of surface measurements for below-knee residua

35Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the absolute and relative precision of geometric measurements made of below knee (BK) residua and their BK plaster positive casts using calipers, electromagnetic digitizer, optical surface scanner (OSS), and spiral x-ray computed tomography (SXCT). Design: The experimental measurement protocol for a single measurement session was as follows: Dot markers were placed on the residuum, and volume and distances were measured using water displacement and calipers; residuum was measured using electromagnetic digitizer; residuum was scanned using three-dimensional (3D) OSS; a negative plaster cast of subject's residuum was made; and residuum was scanned using SXCT scanner. These steps were repeated at a second measurement session. Plaster positive casts were constructed and subsequently measured using the same protocol. Participants: Thirteen adult below-knee amputee volunteers (subjects) participated in the study, and nine subjects returned for a second measurement session. The study group consisted of 9 men and 4 women; 10 Caucasians and 3 African Americans. Results: Distance measurements for all measurement devices were repeatable within 1% in vivo and within 0.5% on plaster casts; and volumes were within 1% in vivo and within 0.1% on plaster casts. Distance measurements for each device were precise within 3% in vivo and within 1% on plaster casts; and volumes were within 5% in vivo and within 6% on plaster casts when compared with caliper and water displacement measures. Conclusion: These measurement systems were found to be substantially equivalent in terms of repeatability and precision for measurement of lower extremity residua.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Commean, P. K., Smith, K. E., Cheverud, J. M., & Vannier, M. W. (1996). Precision of surface measurements for below-knee residua. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(5), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90037-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free