Comparison of the minimally invasive and standard medial parapatellar approaches for total knee arthroplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis

31Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This systematic literature review analysed the efficacy of minimally invasive subvastus (SV) and midvastus (MV) approaches, compared with the standard medial parapatellar (MP) approach, for total knee arthroplasty. Fixed- and random-effect meta-analyses were performed to pool the results of primary studies assessing the mean difference of each clinical outcome. Length of hospital stay was significantly different between the MP and SV approaches, but not between the MP and MV approaches. Blood loss was significantly higher following MP compared with SV. The number of days to perform a straight-leg raise was significantly longer following MP than either MV or SV. In the first 6 months postsurgery, MV was associated with a better range of motion (ROM) than MP. No significant difference in ROM between MP and SV was apparent at 1 year postsurgery. Quadriceps muscle strength recovered significantly more slowly following MP compared with SV. Future studies should assess the efficacy of the quadriceps-sparing approach and compare minimally invasive approaches, assessing intrinsic postoperative differences. © 2011 Field House Publishing LLP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, Z., & Yang, H. (2011, October 1). Comparison of the minimally invasive and standard medial parapatellar approaches for total knee arthroplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of International Medical Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001103900503

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free