Measurement and evaluation of the operating efficiency of china’s basic pension insurance: based on three-stage dea model

20Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to measure the operating efficiency of China’s basic pension insurance from 2014 to 2019 in 31 provinces. Methods: The three-stage DEA model was used to evaluate the operating efficiency of basic pension insurance in 31 provinces. Results: On the whole, the operating efficiency of China’s basic pension insurance was at a high level, but there was still room for improvement. GDP, urbanization level and scale of government public expenditure had a positive impact on the operating efficiency of regional basic pension insurance. In contrast, the old-age dependency ratio had a significant negative effect. There were noticeable regional differences in the operating efficiency of China’s basic pension insurance, which showed a pattern of Central (0.742) >Eastern (0.689) >Western (0.505) after removing the influence of environmental variables. Conclusion: This study systematically analyzes the impact of external environmental regulations on China’s basic pension insurance’s operating efficiency and provides decisionmaking references for further improving the operating efficiency of China’s basic pension insurance. In order to further optimize the allocation of basic endowment insurance, this paper proposes the following countermeasures and suggestions: (1) broaden investment channels and improve the investment efficiency; (2) increase supervision of social security departments and strengthen information disclosure; (3) unify the management of social basic pension insurance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Z., Si, X., Ding, Z., Li, X., Zheng, S., Wang, Y., … Zhang, W. (2021). Measurement and evaluation of the operating efficiency of china’s basic pension insurance: based on three-stage dea model. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 14, 3333–3348. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S320479

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free