This research commentary introduces historical consciousness to studying organizational change. Most theories of organizational change contain within them implicit assumptions about history. Made explicit, these assumptions tend to cluster into different models of change that vary by the assumed objectivity of the past and the associated malleability of the future. We explore and elaborate the implicit assumptions of history. We identify four implicit models of history in the change literature: History-as-Fact, History-as-Power, History-as-Sensemaking, and History-as-Rhetoric. We discuss the implications of theorizing organizational change from each of these views of history and outline future directions for studying change with a heightened understanding of history.
CITATION STYLE
Suddaby, R., & Foster, W. M. (2017, January 1). History and Organizational Change. Journal of Management. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675031
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.