Is violence natural, unnatural, or rational?

26Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Randall Collins - one of Sociology's leading theorists - has applied his erudition to the study of violence. He is a creative thinker who has brought together interesting material from diverse areas. I particularly appreciate the fact that Professor Collins does not restrict his analysis to violence considered deviant or antisocial. It is important to recognize the similarities between legitimate and illegitimate violence. Elite units of the military are similar to hitmen and gangsters, for example, in that both must be able to handle their fear. Violence scholars are, unfortunately, moving in the opposite direction: they often focus on particular types of violence (e.g., domestic violence) ignoring what violent acts have in common. Collins's book is an antidote for those who take, to paraphrase Dennis Wrong, an 'over-specialized conception of man'. However, he relies too heavily on anecdotes to support his arguments, and ignores much of the quantitative literature. I also think he needs to think more carefully about what he is trying to explain, and that is where I begin. © London School of Economics and Political Science 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Felson, R. B. (2009). Is violence natural, unnatural, or rational? British Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01257.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free