Six months of balloon treatment does not predict the success of gastric banding

29Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: We studied whether weight loss by intragastric balloon would predict the outcome of subsequent gastric banding with regard to weight loss and BMI reduction. Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with a body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2 received an intragastric balloon for 6 months followed by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Successful ballooninduced weight loss was defined as ≥10% weight loss after 6 months. Successful surgical weight loss was defined as an additional 15% weight loss in the following 12 months. Patients were divided in group A, losing ≥10% of their initial weight with 6 months' balloon treatment, and group B, losing <10% of their initial weight. Results: In 40 patients (32 female, 8 male; age 36.6 yr, range 26-54), the mean BMI decreased from 46.5 to 40.5 kg/m 2 (P<0.001) after 6 months of balloon treatment and to 35.2 kg/m2 (P<0.001) 12 months after LAGB. Group A (25 patients) and group B (15 patients) had a significant difference in BMI decrease, 12.4 vs 9.0 kg/m2 (P<0.05), after the total study duration of 18 months. However, there was no difference in BMI reduction (4.7 kg/m2 vs 5.8 kg/m2) in the 12 months after LAGB. 6 patients in group A lost ≥10% of their starting weight during 6 months balloon treatment as well as ≥15% 12 months following LAGB. 6 patients in group B lost <10% of their starting weight after 6 months of BIB, but also lost ≥15% 12 months following LAGB. Conclusion: Intragastric balloon did not predict the success of subsequent LAGB. © 2007 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Goederen-Van Der Meij, S., Pierik, R. G. J. M., Pool, M. O., Gouma, D. J., & Mathus-Vliegen, L. M. (2007). Six months of balloon treatment does not predict the success of gastric banding. Obesity Surgery, 17(1), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9011-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free