Insulated and undemocratic: The (im)possibility of social accountability in brazilian courts of accounts

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article examines the transparency of the Brazilian Courts of Accounts to citizens, andwhether these Courts have acted in a way that facilitates social accountability over public administration. The multidimensional scaling technique was used to determine the integrity of the 32 Courts of Accounts in Brazil. Evidence suggests that Brazilian Courts of Accounts are still not transparent to society and count on few mechanisms to help and facilitate citizen control. Evidence also shows that the means of social participation is limited, and represented by the Ombudsman, the Transparency Web Portal, and the Citizen Assistance Service. However, this study identified that the Fiscal Responsibility Law (LRF) and the Access to Information Law (LAI) had a strong influence on the Courts of Accounts. Although gradual, these elements can lead to future changes in terms of an increasingly prominent role of the Courts of Accounts as strong allies in the process of enhancing vertical accountability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Da Rocha, D. G., Zuccolotto, R., & Teixeira, M. A. C. (2020). Insulated and undemocratic: The (im)possibility of social accountability in brazilian courts of accounts. Revista de Administracao Publica, 54(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220190294x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free