We would like to thank Deecke and Soekadar (1) for their insightful comments on our paper (2). We agree that the voluntary movements in our study were not fully unconstrained. A green light was used to indicate to the participant that a trial had started. This indeed raises the question whether our results generalize to movements without external cueing. Please note that, in our study, the green light is not a response trigger. It indicates the onset of a self-timed waiting period that is followed by an open-ended period during which movements could be freely made. In contrast to many studies on the readiness potential (RP), our study did not require participants to move within a specific time. Thus, … [↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: johndylan.haynes{at}gmail.com. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1
CITATION STYLE
Haynes, J.-D., & Schultze-Kraft, M. (2016). Reply to Deecke and Soekadar: Do conventional readiness potentials reflect true volitionality? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(21). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604661113
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.