Efficacy of adding clonidine to intrathecal morphine in acute postoperative pain: Meta-analysis

68Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BackgroundClonidine may be used along with intrathecal morphine for single-dose postoperative analgesia in adults. The efficacy of this is not clear.MethodsA meta-analysis was performed for two endpoints of efficacy: the time to first postoperative analgesia request and the amount of systemic morphine used during the first 24 h after operation. A Bayesian inference supporting direct statements about the probability of the magnitude of an effect was also used. The frequency of the five adverse events (postoperative nausea or vomiting, sedation, respiratory depression, pruritus, and hypotension) was analysed.ResultsClonidine increased the duration of analgesia by 1.63 h [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-2.33]. There is a 90% probability that clonidine increases the duration of postoperative analgesia by more than 75 min compared with morphine alone. Clonidine reduced the amount of postoperative morphine by a mean of 4.45 mg (95% CI: 1.40-7.49 mg). There is a probability of 90% to obtain a decrease >2.3 mg but only 35% to obtain a decrease >5 mg. The incidence of hypotension was the only adverse event increased by clonidine (odds ratio 1.78; 95% CI: 1.02-3.12).ConclusionsThe addition of clonidine to intrathecal morphine extends the time to first analgesia and decreases the amount of morphine used. However, as the effects are small, and the results heavily influenced by a study in which intrathecal fentanyl was also given, this must be balanced with the increased frequency of hypotension. © The Author [2012]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Engelman, E., & Marsala, C. (2013). Efficacy of adding clonidine to intrathecal morphine in acute postoperative pain: Meta-analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free