Unfavorable factors in accessing the pelvicalyceal system during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (fURS)

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is a well-established procedure for treating multiple upper-urinary tract pathologies, particularly renoureteral lithiasis. Endoscopes have undergone significant advancements, including miniaturization, improved optics, and increased maneuverability. In addition, advancements in accessory instruments, such as the performance of laser fibers, guidewires, and extraction probes, have played a significant role in improving the overall performance of flexible ureteroscopy procedures. However, despite these advancements, unique circumstances can make achieving optimum results during flexible ureteroscopy challenging. These include congenital renal anomalies (horse-shoe kidneys, ectopic kidneys, rotation anomalies), as well as the unique intrarenal anatomy (infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular length) or the specifications of the endoscope in terms of maneuverability (active and passive deflection). This review explored challenging scenarios during flexible ureteroscopy procedures in the pyelocaliceal system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geavlete, B., Mareș, C., Popescu, R. I., Mulțescu, R., Ene, C., & Geavlete, P. (2023, March 1). Unfavorable factors in accessing the pelvicalyceal system during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (fURS). Journal of Medicine and Life. Carol Davila University Press. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2023-0005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free