The End of Roe v. Wade

7Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Supreme Court seems poised to overrule Roe v. Wade and hold that there is no constitutional right to choose abortion. The reversal of Roe seems to run counter to public opinion in the United States—while many favor restrictions, a clear majority do not want Roe reversed and favor access to abortion early in pregnancy. The current Court’s apparent willingness to run the risk of political pushback has a complex history. Scholars have long described the Court as a countermajoritarian institution, but in practice, as historians have shown, the Court tends not to stray too far from popular opinion. For a Court bent on reversing Roe and tackling a long list of other divisive topic, concerns about institutional legitimacy no longer appear to be an effective check. A post-Roe Court may be more unplugged from popular opinion, with unpredictable results for the future of the democracy.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ziegler, M. (2022). The End of Roe v. Wade. American Journal of Bioethics, 22(8), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2075962

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free