Texture segregation shows only a very small lower-hemifield advantage

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Possible hemifield differences in texture segregation were investigated for both simple (Fourier, linear) and complex (non-Fourier, second-order) texture channels. There was only a very small lower-field advantage for texture segregation, consistent with the notion that the major processing in texture segregation is quite low level, perhaps V1. Complex-channel tasks do not show larger hemifield asymmetries than do simple-channel tasks, which suggests that the processes in complex texture channels are not higher level than those in simple.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graham, N., Rico, M., Offen, S., & Scott, W. (1999). Texture segregation shows only a very small lower-hemifield advantage. Vision Research, 39(6), 1171–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00170-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free