Maternal complications in molecularly confirmed diandric and digynic triploid pregnancies: single institution experience and literature review

11Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Assessment of the maternal complications in molecularly confirmed diandric and digynic triploid pregnancies. Methods: Sonographic features, biochemical results, and clinical presentation were analyzed. Beta-hCG level was controlled after diandric triploidy. Results: The study included nine diandric and twelve digynic triploid pregnancies at the mean gestational age at diagnosis of 14.9 and 18.0 weeks, respectively (p = 0.0391). Mean value of total-hCG was 979 703.6 U/ml in diandric cases and 5 455.4 U/ml in digynic ones (p < 0.000). Maternal complications occurred in 88.9% of diandric triploid pregnancies, including: thecalutein cysts (44.4%), hyperemesis gravidarum (44.4%), symptomatic hyperthyreosis (33.3%), early onset gestational hypertension (22.2%) and vaginal bleeding (11.1%). No case of proteinuria, preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome was observed. Only maternal complication observed in digynic triploidy was vaginal bleeding (50.0%). The mean time of beta-hCG normalization after diandric triploid pregnancies was 84 days (range 11–142 days). No case of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) was observed. Conclusions: Maternal complications (except for vaginal bleeding) are associated with diandric triploidy. The relatively low incidence of hypertensive maternal complications and their less severe course in our cohort may be attributed to the earlier prenatal diagnosis. The frequency of GTN after diandric triploidy may be lower than previously reported.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Massalska, D., Bijok, J., Kucińska-Chahwan, A., Zimowski, J. G., Ozdarska, K., Raniszewska, A., … Roszkowski, T. (2020). Maternal complications in molecularly confirmed diandric and digynic triploid pregnancies: single institution experience and literature review. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 301(5), 1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05515-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free