Discriminating contrast discontinuities: Asymmetries, dipper functions, and perceptual learning

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.


In a visual search task, a target has to be found among distractors. For two given elements A and B, the search difficulty can depend on which of the two elements is defined as the target, a phenomenon called search asymmetry. Here, we study to what degree an element's ability to 'win' in a search asymmetry depends on its absolute contrast (first-stage signal) and to what degree it depends on its contrast difference from the background (second-stage signal). One quadrant contained a target texture (2 × 2 Gabor patches of contrast ctg), and the other three quadrants contained distractor textures (2 × 2 Gabor patches of contrast cdt). These four 'foreground textures' were embedded in a background texture consisting of patches with contrast cbg. The task was to identify which quadrant contained the target. Quadrants are referred to as increments (foreground contrast cfg > cbg), or decrements (cfg < cbg). We found that the second-stage signal determines which element wins the performance asymmetry, i.e. it is easier to find strong increments (decrements) among weak increments (decrements) than vice versa. A comparison of our data with the prediction of the independent-processing model [Vision Res. 40 (2000) 2677] shows that the observed performance asymmetries are in general too large to be attributed to noise differences alone. Rather, asymmetries might reflect a global competition between salient elements. Moreover, performance asymmetries can reverse during practice. We characterize a dipper-shaped nonlinearity on the second stage: discrimination of increment (decrement) signals x and x + Δx first improves for increasing x, and then deteriorates. © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.




Zenger-Landolt, B., & Fahle, M. (2001). Discriminating contrast discontinuities: Asymmetries, dipper functions, and perceptual learning. Vision Research, 41(23), 3009–3021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00180-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free