Polar policy making: Two ethnographic accounts of Polar field scientists interacting with Polar governance and policy

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This review article discusses the recent publications Studying Arctic Fields by Richard C Powell and The Technocratic Antarctic by Jessica O’Reilly. Both books are ethnographic accounts of scientists working in the Polar Regions that analyse interactions at the science–policy interface. Studying Arctic Fields is a detailed story of Canada’s Resolute research station, based on immersive ethnographic observation and communicated through an engaging narrative of colourful stories from Powell’s two summers among the scientists and support staff there. The Technocratic Antarctic treads new ground in its examination of Antarctic social science, presenting the findings of a wide-ranging and thorough research project that engages with the themes of territory, security, processes, practice, problems and science communication. Both publications make valuable contributions to Polar social science and will also appeal to many beyond this.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferguson, L. (2019, September 1). Polar policy making: Two ethnographic accounts of Polar field scientists interacting with Polar governance and policy. International Sociology. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580919870455

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free