Defining Nature

15Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In any attempt to “rethink” biodiversity governance, we need to consider that defining nature (and related concepts such as biodiversity, ecosystems, landscapes or green infrastructure) is not merely an objective scientific exercise. In reality, context-specific, subjective, normative and dynamic worldviews and values are at play in any definition of nature, whether explicitly or implicitly. Being aware of this pluralism is essential for avoiding “objective” definitional attitudes that risk disregarding and marginalizing the plurality of values and worldviews connected to different definitions of nature. In fact, paternalistic positions can create breeding grounds for fruitless dialogues between stakeholders, and thus pluralistic approaches help open up spaces for discussion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keune, H., Immovilli, M., Keller, R., Maynard, S., McElwee, P., Molnár, Z., … Reeth, W. V. (2022). Defining Nature. In Transforming Biodiversity Governance (pp. 25–42). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474222372.ch-002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free