The Effect of Insurance Type on Fragility Fracture Patient Access to Endocrinology Under the Affordable Care Act

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect of insurance type (Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance) on fragility fracture patients’ access to endocrinology specialists in the postoperative period. Materials and Methods: The research team called 247 board-certified endocrinologists in 8 representative states. The caller requested an appointment for her fictitious mother to be evaluated for osteoporosis after suffering a hip fracture that required surgery. The caller stated that her mother had an abnormal level of parathyroid hormone and her mother’s orthopedic surgeon believed she needed to see an endocrinologist. Each office was called 3 times to assess the responses for each insurance type. For each call, we documented whether the patient was able to receive an appointment and the barriers the patient confronted to receiving an appointment. Results: About 15.8% of offices scheduled an appointment for a patient with Medicaid, compared to 48.6% for Medicare and 54.3% for BlueCross (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wiznia, D. H., Ndon, S., Kim, C. Y., Zaki, T., & Leslie, M. P. (2017). The Effect of Insurance Type on Fragility Fracture Patient Access to Endocrinology Under the Affordable Care Act. Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 8(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151458516681635

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free