Successes and failures: What did we learn from recent first-line treatment immunotherapy trials in non-small cell lung cancer?

62Citations
Citations of this article
137Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly modified the therapeutic landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in second-line and, more recently, first-line settings. Because of the superior outcome with pembrolizumab as an upfront strategy, PD-L1 status should now be considered a new reflex biomarker for guiding first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Improved responses have also been reported with the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy as the first-line treatment; however, this strategy has not yet been validated by phase III trial data and its interplay with PD-L1 status still requires clarification. In this manuscript we review the contradictory results of recent phase III trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line setting, the potential reasons for discrepancies, and some of the remaining open questions related to the positioning of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line setting of non-small cell lung cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Remon, J., Besse, B., & Soria, J. C. (2017, March 13). Successes and failures: What did we learn from recent first-line treatment immunotherapy trials in non-small cell lung cancer? BMC Medicine. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0819-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free